domingo

The Exploits of Erik

Erik was a Belgian, Erik was a thief. Erik became a media star and turned over a whole new leaf.

from Lookout March 1996

 
Nothing really all that odd about a thief in church. As a matter of fact, you will often find a pair of them flanking the central figure on most altarpieces. But last August, when one such individual was given the run of the pulpit, streetwise Spanish reporters scrambled to Roda de Isábena, a one-telephone town tucked away in the high Pyrenees.

"I must follow the path of my heart," intoned the man known on Interpol rap sheets as Erik the Belgian, addressing camera crews and curious locals who had Roda's magnificent but moth eaten cathedral packed to the archivault. The seat of a thriving medieval diocese, Roda's current population is 31 full-time souls.

"Now that I am 55 years old, acts of love do not come as easy as they once did," expounded Erik, whose real name is René Alphonse van den Berghe. "So I can atone for the harm I've done only by offering that which I've made with the labor of my own hands."

Gesturing towards 17 framed oil paintings mounted on the choir stalls, and turning to Father José María Leminyana, he said, "I am asking that you accept these as a token of my deep respect, even though it comes from a bandit".

The pictures -- which turned out to be oil paintings by Erik of the eleventh-century cathedral -- were to pay for the restoration of a Gothic triptych, one of the pieces he could not be bothered to steal the last time he came to town, sixteen years previously.

Roda's missing artworks never added up to more than a trickle among the truckloads of treasure looted by Erik during the 30-year criminal career he makes no bones about confessing to, now that the statute of limitations has runs out. But Fr. Leminyana had best forget about the ninth century seat of San Ramón, which Erik deliberately broke up to smuggle it out of the country. He hints, though, chances are better for a pair of Coptic liturgical combs which his expert eye deems "unique in all the world".

Oh, really? He's offering to give back his booty? Well, not exactly. But he'll be glad to make discrete contact with the present owners and negotiate mutually satisfactory terms. Only the vulgar would call it "ransom". 

He's all heart, this guy. Just don't press him about what police say is a hoard of Romanesque and Gothic ivories constituting his personal "pick of the crop" stashed away in some Swiss bank vault and which is not going anywhere, of that you can be sure. 

Erik's alleged grand cru collection was culled from thousands of polychrome wooden statues, furniture, illuminated manuscripts, Church plate and other sacred artworks -- you name it, he stole it. But only the beautiful pieces, never the merely valuable ones.

For larceny gave him more than just a lucrative living, it was his own peculiar form of art appreciation. "Stealing art is an act of pleasure," he told an El País reporter as part of his summer self-promotion blitz, confiding that he literally took some of his looted booty to bed with him.

Mind you, Erik wasn't always so forthcoming. Just two years ago he was indignantly insisting that he merely acted as middleman for works of questionable origin being pilfered by venial priests, sacristans and even the odd bishop or two.

"The Spanish clergy behaved like the moneylenders in their own temples. But nobody ever accused them of sacrilege for selling artworks whose mystery and spiritual content were oblivious to them."

Since then he's been singing a different tune and acknowledges that the Roda job is one of Erik's (sometimes he says 60, sometimes 200) robberies on Spanish soil. With hardly a padlock for protection, the churches and monasteries of Old Castile and the Catalonian hinterland were his targets of preference.

All crooks prey on the vulnerable. But Erik never shrunk from a big time challenge like the Royal Palace of Aranjuez, or Yuste Monastery. Or the Olot Diocesan Museum, which was located directly above the Guardia Civil barracks. (He slipped in through the roof.) To hear Erik tell it, though, in his heart of hearts he felt he was salvaging priceless works from destructive damp, termites, and the indifference of those entrusted with their preservation. I love, therefore I steal is the line he now peddles to the press.

"In Spain," he maintains, "nobody cared about their heritage until I started making off with it. You didn't even know what you had; no inventory existed. It was an absolute scandal."  He claims that one parish priest was snipping pieces out of Flemish tapestries woven to designs by Rubens to unblock a doorway, and insists "the whole country was a gold mine, art was just lying about everywhere."

How exactly did he stage his heists? Erik is giving away no secrets at this late date but oil stains make it clear that hydraulic jacks were used to burst down doors when heavy duty bolt cutters would not suffice.

Did he ever use violence? No, says Erik, not in the act. Once, though, a client who tried to do him down on prices had to be suspended by his heels from an upper story window until he saw the light of reason.

Which brings up the question of where, exactly, the purloined artworks ended up. According to Erik, stories you hear of Brazilian millionaires slavering over Cezannes in some underground bunker or oil sheikhs sporting Lautrec lampshades are not far off the beam.

"Every robbery is carried out by prior arrangement with the buyer," Erik claims."Individuals who realize they are purchasing an object that is a direct reflection of God, something truly holy. Which is why they buy for love, and will pay whatever price is asked."

"I am just the tip of an iceberg that extends to the great artistic shrines of the USA, a few European countries and Japan. Wherever there is a great culture you will find great collectors. In Spain," he adds disdainfully, "all you've got are investors."

Being on chummy terms with the rich and unscrupulous was one reason why Spanish police had a tough time bringing him to heel. "They were looking for me in all the wrong places. They were looking in the underworld," he sneers.

When they finally did nab him, in January 1981, it was after sitting down to dinner at a Casteldefells luxury restaurant, albeit police were forced to stake their quarry from a nearby frankfurter stand. Erik managed to give them the slip but was arrested when he went to scrupulously pay his hotel bill.

During the subsequent 37 months he dined in at Barcelona's Prision Modelo, Erik painted 300 paintings, was regularly beaten and tortured by members of Madrid's Art Crimes Brigade (so he says), perfected his Spanish and did good works in the infirmary. By an odd sort of coincidence, during that same period, police managed to recover 1,600 missing artworks, which made Culture Ministry officials so mightily pleased that in 1983 they mounted an exhibition in Madrid highlighting over 200 of them.

That Erik played his "get out of jail free" card is beyond question. Doubtless he would have been released even earlier were it not for pending extradition requests and a most ill-advised escape attempt in 1983 in which in the best B movie tradition, he knotted bedsheets together and descended from the hospital room to which he had been transferred after complaining of chest pains. Then he hired a taxi to go to Zaragoza, where his twenty-something girlfriend of the moment was living.

They let him keep money in jail? The taxi driver didn't notice his passenger was wearing pajamas? Whatever, Erik had the miserable luck to choose the very night that police roadblocks were out everywhere to catch ETA terrorists.

After getting out in 1985, Erik settled down to the quiet life in Málaga, of all places. For the past ten years Spanish authorities have allowed him to live discretely in the very country he systematically pillaged. Perhaps the stolen art that at irregular intervals continues to turn up unannounced at their embassies in Paris and Rome may have something to do with this extreme instance of Spanish bureaucratic benevolence.

In Málaga, a lucky seventh marriage to a Spanish criminal lawyer provided him with his first son, in addition to first class legal defense services, and he even signed with Telecinco TV network to host a series that later fell through.And he kept up with his own painting while undertaking the odd local decorating job: La Malagueta and the Cercado de Calderón restaurants are his work. For the record, Erik claims a member of the  Belgian royal family gave him his most lucrative portrait commission.

In 1993, however, the good life of the well-heeled working expat seemed at an end when Spain tossed Erik briefly back in the slammer after the Brussels government pressed for his extradition. Not that he stayed there for long; the statute of limitations on his crimes had run out. But Erik insists it was a crude attempt to pressure him into fingering his clients, from whom Brussels sought to recover various pieces whose disappearance he had nothing to do with.

That's all in the past now. He's got money and respectability, and from the looks of things, is pushing hard for celebrity status. Showing off the snapshots he had taken of himself in the churches he plundered, making sure fawning reporters hear about the bottles of champagne he left behind for his victims.

This is a repentant sinner? Father Leminyana appears to think so. "It was the right gesture for him to make," he says. And Erik, for his part, asserts that "Now that I have obtained the holy father's forgiveness I feel much better about living in Spain."

But at least some of Roda de Isábena's 31 inhabitants are having none of it. "So where are our stolen statues?" asked one who made a point of not being present at Erik's public act of contrition. "He doesn't have to rob for a living because he lives from his robberies -- that's supposed to make him a saint? Some nerve he has coming back here. I don't want to criticize our priest though, and maybe it will be good for tourism."

###
You just know this is going to go viral in no time at all, but it's too good not to run, don't you think?


martes

Tour de Force

from New Partisan, March 10, 2006

Or maybe more like a forced tour? Or maybe it’s just me, getting old and cranky and too easily startled by innovation. But surely I can’t be the only one who was taken aback on hearing about the Concert Companion®, the latest in handheld gizmos hell-bent on transforming our lives. This time it’s the experience of listening to live classical music that gets the business. It happened during a heavyweight bout in which Beethoven and Mahler duked it out, with an assist from the Oakland East Bay Symphony. I wasn’t there, but got to read about it in the Feb. 28, 2005 LA Times.


The CoCo is made in the size and semblance of a PDA and does its wireless work by relaying real-time words and images of a edifying character to concertgoers in the intimacy of the uppermost stalls. According to the newspaper, enlightenment comes in the form of a text message on the backlit screen notifying the operator that “the bass builds in intensity” when the bass starts building in intensity, and ditto for "the strings sing seductively" later on.
You can also beam down color images to reinforce whatever critical consensus has established as the effect or mood the poor devil of a multimedia-challenged composer was trying to create with mere music. Perhaps a Pixar puppet show for Petrushka or a Beardsley faun for Debussy? You have to be cautious, though, about attaching visual referents to music. Who can hear Ponchielli without flashing on a bunch of leering crocodiles trying to either eat or rape all those prancing ostriches and hippos in tutus?
On the other hand, there’s something to be said for a full frontal podium camcast that gives the audience something more than the conductor’s flapping elbows and coattails. Anyone who’s ever ended up in the bleachers at the Hollywood Bowl must be grateful the big screens (and skillful camera work) that allow you to see the performers whose music is coming at you from a full city block away.
Opera buffs by now have gotten used to large or small-format subtitle screens, and these are generally seen as a helpful, non-intrusive convergence between technology and the arts. But performance mediated by experts goes back a way. Ever since the first transistor radios came out, fans have been taking them to the stadium so as not to miss out on the play-by play, enhancing the spectator’s experience with the expertise of a Mel Allen or Jimmy Dudley.
Taken together, these amenities constitute what CoCo inventor Roland Valliere terms “experience enhancement." And if you’re still bored out of your skull while the fat lady keeps on belting them out, you can – well, maybe not quite yet, but I can see it coming — get in a couple rounds of Donkey Kong before the clapping starts.
One way of looking at it is just as a digital delivery system for the same product traditionally packaged in the form of program notes. Who could object to retailing biographical anecdote bites, contextualizing a work in its period and bringing up a few musicological talking points to give a rough idea of what the composer was up to and exactly how he made the sounds come out the way they do?
What I find interesting, though, is that the product’s purveyors emphasize it “should be seen primarily as a means of broadening the audience for orchestra concerts, and secondarily as a means of deepening the experience for conventional concertgoers.” In other words, they’re pitching orchestra managers a security blanket for potential ticket buyers who feel themselves to be too obtuse to experience classical music without a crutch, or who sort of like what they’re hearing but feel they might miss out on something unless they know – unless they have been told — what they should listen for.
In times of dwindling public interest and permanent financial crisis, you can’t blame orchestras for grasping at anything that promises to renew and replenish their faltering audiences. CoCo inventor Roland Valliere says his device “provides a value-added experience akin to museum audio tours - except Concert Companion is a visual enhancement of an aural experience, instead of the other way around - making the music accessible to a greater number of listeners."
The analogy seemed not unreasonable, but made me wonder if music lovers would succumb to the same extent that canned guided spiels seem to have become de rigeur as an accessory on museum visits. Accordingly, I headed back to California determined to end my long-standing boycott of audio-enhanced museum going when I went for a look at the much-touted King Tut show at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art. It cost me six bucks to find out what I have been missing, and it turned out to be Omar Sharif, his disembodied voice indistinguishable to me from that of Ricardo Montalban’s way back when he was bossing the dwarf around.

Sharif slides down the vocal register to a hammy hissed whisper as he evokes the mysterious Egyptian past, but his narrative merely paraphrases the labels on the display cases, though less than a third of the treasures on exhibit get audio coverage. I should have thought the earphone option would be to allow you to opt in for extra content, instead of a few E-minor chords to embellish Omar’s anecdotes of pharaonic peculiarities. By the same token, the soundtrack from a National Geographic special would have been a welcome curtain-raiser and time killer while waiting an hour in line to get in.
So I had just about decided I would stick to my Luddite rejection of the CoCo and all its intelligent iPod brethren when it suddenly hit me: a memory rush of undergraduate reading and the constant bobbing up and down the page to retrieve the inevitable and indispensable Shakespearian footnote. Wouldn’t the Concert Companion be wonderful as a footnote-on-demand system during a live stage performance?

It might work like this: Hamlet, Act II, Scene II: “Then are our beggar bodies our monarchs, and outstretched heroes the beggars’ shadows.” Beg pardon, prince? We need only consult the console in our lap, and up pops Steven Greenblatt to lend us a hand: “Then beggars, being without ambition, are not shadows but have substance: if monarchs and heroes (who ambitiously ‘stretch’ too far) are shadows and only substantial bodies can cast shadows, they must be the beggars’ shadows.”

Er, right. Thanks for that. But I have to agree with the melancholy Dane that “it offends me to the soul to hear a robustious, periwig-pated fellow tear a passion to tatters, to very rags, to split the ears of the groundlings, who for the most part are capable of nothing but inexplicable dumbshows and noise.”
###

viernes

Photography: Isabel Muñoz

from Focus, Jan-Feb.2006

Isabel Muñoz's fifteen-year retrospective in the underground gallery in Madrid's Plaza de Colon this past autumn could make you believe she knows how photograph the human body like the idea of photographing the human body had never occurred to anyone until she came along. Of course, a claim like that comes with a catch: not just any old human body need apply. But the line forms here if your qualifications include physical perfection, the ability to fly through the air or contort yourself into geometric shapes that would have baffled M.C.Escher.  

So her subjects are bodies that have been intensively shaped and disciplined. Dancers (from the National Ballet of Cuba and Spain's Victor Ullate company), folk dancers (flamenco, tango, belly and Asian), circus acrobats, honest-to-God Shaolin monks, or anyone with proportions and musculature that would turn a Greek statue green with envy. In her quest for the somatic singularities she wanted to find new ways of expressing, Muñoz did a Leni Reifenstahl and headed for Africa, where she found it among the Surma people of  Ethiopia and on the Ivory Coast. The pictures she brought back from Africa are some of the most impressive in a career portfolio already packed with images that will bear looking at for a long time to come.

Odd there should be no nudes (which is good nudes, I guess). She does allow herself a couple of clever but harmless visual double entendres, an undertaking possibly trickier than conveying sensuality or raw sex. There is also no background (in other words, no context) for her bodies, just the warm and fuzzy grayscale of the large platinum prints she so expertly prints herself.

That's just one part of the show, the major part, a retrospective view of the work that  Isabel Muñoz made her reputation with. Since then, she has ventured into new pictorial and empathic territory, the brothels of Cambodia where children are enslaved and abused. Her photographic language changes because the photographer's function obviously has to change in a situation like that.

What do we see in those children's haunted faces? Were you expecting  windows into their tormented, violated souls? Or to put it another way, would a viewer react to these photographs in the same way if they were not captioned?

I think probably not, and to see the difference, check out Born in Brothels the compilation by Zana Briski of photos taken not just of, but by children  born, raised and condemned to spend their lives as prostitutes in Calcutta's city-within-a-city red-light district. Everything that can possibly be said about the subject is in those pictures (including the children's ability to maintain laughter and hope). Does it matter that Briski’s brutalized children are in Calcutta, and Muñoz’s in Cambodia? It shouldn’t -- unless you think photographers should divvy up the world's misery and cruelty into parcels of turf, where Sebastiao Salgado gets dibs on Sao Paulo street children, and so on.

Is that just another way of saying that if you've seen one serially raped, violated, brutalized, permanently damaged Asian child, you've seen them all? This is going to get me in trouble, but actually, yes, you have. Unless the image somehow impacts in a new way, it is in a sense superfluous, no matter how valuable it may be as documentation. And Muñoz is much too good with a camera to settle for that.
####

lunes

No Ifs, Ands or....

Photography reviewed in Culture Wars, 5 November 2007
“Ocultos”  Fundación Canal Madrid : ended January 2008.
Dr Johnson would have loved it, and so would my eleven-year-old son. The Great Cham had Boswell & co. rolling on the floor when he absently-mindedly remarked of a certain lady that she ‘had a bottom of good sense.’ Before the laughter had a chance to die down, Johnson showed he was as deft as any talk show host at the art of split-second recovery: ‘Where’s the merriment? I say the woman was fundamentally sensible.’
It is in that frame of mind that one should visit the show at the former Madrid Water Works. ‘Ocultos’ (a pun, yes, though a strained one, culo being Spanish for bottom) brings together a cull (so much for self-restraint) of photographs in which prominent practitioners of the art depict or evoke the posterior parts of human anatomy. You should not expect anything so obvious as just having the photographer shoot a picture while the subject is shooting the moon, though. Well, all right, just one, then, by Jeanloup Sieff.
Painting, to be sure, has not exactly neglected the nether regions, as we are reminded in a text quoting Titian to his patron, Spain’s King Philip II, in which the painter slyly anticipates that his fleshy rear view of ‘Venus and Adonis’ will be ‘even more agreeable to His Majesty’.  Personally, I’m a big fan of Burne-Jones’ nude cutie Andromeda, but for some reason, hers have always struck me as being unremittingly British buttocks. Flabby but unyielding, like Churchill. More in my line is the reddish-brown peach sported by the Polynesian girl in Gauguin’s ‘Spirit of the Dead Watching’.
The Madrid photos eschew the selectively idiosyncratic for the sake of wideness of range and loose entry requirements. Representations are allowed, as well as the real thing, which means we get to revisit a 1961 classic by the grand old man of Spanish photographers, Ramón Masats, of Prado museum-goers contemplating Rubens' 'Three Graces'. The tell-tale tricorne hat on one viewer (then, as now, standard issue Civil Guard  gear) and tilted head of the lady sitting next to him  make it clear that scandal and stupefaction are in the air. In more modern reading of the same image might have them commiserating with the three ladies’ serious cellulitis issues.
My favorite depiction of depiction is Robert Doisneau’s 'Regard oblique', in which a middle-aged couple oozing bourgeois respectability is seen through the art dealer’s front window into which they are peering, the woman intently talking up one of the pieces while the husband’s beady eyes are riveted on the buns of a Renoir-like bathing beauty over on the opposite side of the frame.
Though the contents are fundamentally sensible, I’ll admit I don’t think much of the packaging. In accordance with somebody’s idea of mock titillation, the walls have been papered with New Orleans bordello plush and doors fitted with peep holes through which can be seen a slide show of the 67 photographs hung throughout the underground galleries that used to be the distribution hub for Madrid’s incoming fresh water supply. Do they really think the lechers of yesteryear didn’t insist on full frontal? That’s what the nightclub patrons in Burt Glinn’s ‘A Stripper at the Club Samoa on 52nd Street’ from 1949 would have liked, though it’s clear the nudies are wearing body stockings. 
Though humor and pornography rely equally on exaggeration, none of the pieces here strike me as terribly erotic. Herb Ritts is up to his usual, although for once Mapplethorpe is restrained in his Ken Moody gatefold of the month. Susan Meiselas gives us a rent-by-the-hour dominatrix and the red welts she has inflicted on some character’s pathetic behind, while Man Ray captures Paul Eluard’s muse, Nusch, in silhouette (but a butt with only two dimensions is not that interesting). Marilyn Monroe (with her trademark ‘Oops, excuse me!’ glance over the shoulder) appears half-draped in Eve Arnold’s photo, her emergent behind illustrating Plato’s paradigm of the whole that acquires a nominative identity in a manner ontologically distinct from its parts.
It may seem surprising that the proportion of bare to clothed (or semi-covered) is pretty close to even, but photographically it makes all kinds of sense. The same rough parity exists between male and female, depending on how you count the toddler in Robert Capa’s scene from an Israeli kibbutz. Best in show as far as I am concerned is Willy Ronis’ view from 1949 of his wife getting up after a late afternoon nap, classical in its interplay of Provençal sunlight, shadow, form and texture, the textbook definition of photographic intimism. Why isn’t there more of this man’s work on display in places where I am likely to see it?
I was also drawn to a distant nymph on a seacliff prominence by Fernando Manso, with its Maxfield Parrish overtones, and Harry Callahan’s ‘Eleanor by the Radiator’, Eleanor supplying the curves and the radiator the straight lines. Surprisingly good, though derivative, was a photo by Josep Renau, the one-time Commissar of Fine Arts for the Spanish Republic who persuaded Picasso to paint 'Guernica'.  Renau spent most of his life in East Berlin, his photography underwritten by Stalinist sinecures, where he died in 1982 after deciding he didn’t much care for what democracy was doing for Spain.
In the covered culo category, kudos go to Isabel Muñoz, by far the most interesting Spanish photographer on the scene,  absolutely the best. Her close-up of a Cuban dancer in a tight, tight dress evokes a spinner’s spindle and a child’s wooden top, but one that is unquestionably made out of living flesh. As usual, Muñoz‘s work has been expertly printed by the photographer herself. Nobody  comes anywhere near to her when it comes to getting gelatin silver or platinum to sing.
Some (Joan Fontcuberta, Claude Fauville) highlight the plastic properties of the human rump as it is squeezed, kneaded, displaced or otherwise deformed either by human agency (hands) or by the camera (Bill Brandt, Andre Kermes, Manuel Seneca). Others, like Rafael Navarro, take us up close and personal to highlight the surface area exposed by the outward thrust of the gluteus Maximus, with all its pores, moles and cellulite dimples.
Predictably, a fair number zero in on extra-large tonnage type posteriors, starting with William Klein, who, being William Klein, makes a beeline for the obvious, in this case a crouching sumo wrestler approached from low and behind. At the opposite end is Eikoh Hosoe, who extracts essence of Brancusi from a pair of tightly compressed legs and unobtrusive hemispheric crack.
Never will there be a better chance to put to the test Kenneth Tynan’s claim that ‘the buttocks are the most aesthetically pleasing part of the body because they are non-functional. Although they conceal an essential orifice, these pointless globes are as near as the human form can ever come to abstract art’. He forgot to add that what makes it even more fascinating is that it is the major part of our bodies we never get to see, but others certainly do.
###

Photography: Valery Katsuba

Focus, April 2007

Valery Katsuba
Círculo de Bellas Artes, Madrid
12 Dec  2006  -- 7 Jan 2007

It’s no secret that the Germans were heavily into body building, seeking to attain extremes of sculptural perfection exulted in Triumph of the Will, Leni Reifenstahl’s Olympic paean to Aryan values. The homoerotic undercurrents are hard to miss in period photos of blonde beasts with big biceps and wasp waists. How typically, how inevitably German, you think, but now it turns out they were up to pretty much the same thing in Russia. Who knew?  

We do, now, thanks to several thousand photographs filed away and forgotten in the Cinema and Photographic Archives of St Petersburg. They date back to the 1880s, when local photographer Karl Bulla was commissioned to create beefcake albums by and for the phiscultura societies that flourished in Russia’s second city. His customers tended to be upper-class males showing off anatomic bulges, but auxiliary organizations “for the physical and spiritual development of daughters of the aristocracy” also sprung up as part of a craze that swept through late-Tsarist high society.   

Later on, we see factory workers heaving medicine balls around during their lunch break, the better to  transform themselves into the “new” model Soviet man, in photos taken by Karl’s son, Viktor -- but that was before he was shipped off to the Gulag in 1938. Afterwards, the physical culture movement was subsumed by paramilitary pantomime (Busby Berkeley with bayonets, cartwheels in gas masks). Throughout the Cold War era, grass-roots support for body building and fitness remained a state priority since it contributed to Soviet sweeps of Olympic gold and “it was considered a social disgrace for healthy people not to engage in sport.” 

When photographer Valery Katsuba came across this trove, it was a revelation. He set out to see if he could establish a time-bending dialogue between these pictures and his own. With our radically different notions of what constitutes an ideal physique, can the iconographic conventions of two bygone ages be valid in the 21st century? The short answer is: bet on it.
 
That’s because Katsuba is a fabulously gifted photographer and his pictures – which are absolutely devoid of irony or false empathy--- simply blow away the 20-odd smaller archival finds on display. Only a few of his subjects are body builders, and they are posed subversively as a mounds of muscle mass, no features visible, against a backdrop of porcelain, crystal chandeliers and wall frescos in a princely Rococo palace. The rest are athletes, dancers, circus acrobats who establish continuity with the sepia-toned strongmen through the way their bodies are made “to reveal what is secret and beautiful in their nature” says Katsuba, who is incredibly successful at capturing exactly those qualities in his images.



You read it here first: this guy is a natural, a prodigy, the farm boy who strides shoelessly up to the plate and bats them into the bleachers. Hard to believe he never picked up a SLR camera before the year 2000, but there you are.

 ###